Tread Lightly! 4x4 PSA BlueRibbon Coalition PSA California Association of 4 Wheel Drive Clubs

OutdoorWire Calendar

4x4Voice Talk

The Carnegie SVRA General Plan team wants your input on concept alternatives whi...
1 month ago 0 983
The next meeting of the Bureau of Land Management’s (BLM) California Desert Advi...
1 month ago 0 277
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Off-Highway Motor Vehicle Recreation (OHMVR) Com...
1 month ago 0 320
The Sierra National Forest is in the middle of conducting a Forest Assessment, g...
2 months ago 0 624
California State Parks Director General Tony Jackson (USMC-Ret) was in attendanc...
2 months ago 0 747

Leave Your Comments

Additional information about the Greater Sage Grouse issue is available at: Federal Register Scopin...
The is one on the many monthly reports from the Cal4 NRC published on this site.
CA4WDC NRC South - Oct 2012 in Joomla Article
Wow, more stuff to learn. Thanks for the updates. Del

4x4Voice BLOGS

BLM Issues Final Plan for Managing Imperial Sand Dunes Recreation Area
Imperial Sand Dunes Recreation Area
Plan addresses recreational access issues, protects critical habitat for sensitive species The Bure...
Continue Reading...
Forest Service Releases Bio-Regional Assessment
Stanislaus NF
English: (Photo credit: Wikipedia) Sonora, CA - The Forest Service has put out a Bio-Regional A...
Continue Reading...
BLM Announces ISDRA Subgroup Public Meeting
Imperial Sand Dunes Recreation Area
Seal of the BLM (Photo credit: Wikipedia) The Imperial Sand Dunes Recreation Area (ISDRA) Subgr...
Continue Reading...
Inyo Topic Papers review and comment extended
Inyo NF
Hot Creek (Photo credit: Wikipedia) The Inyo National Forest is extending the public review and...
Continue Reading...




Litigation PDF Print E-mail
User Rating: / 0
PoorBest 
Saturday, 17 November 2007 14:02

Forest Planning Process
STEP FIVE: Litigation


WHAT IT IS: Before going to court you must, under law, exhaust your administrative remedies.

If the Forest Service is preparing an environmental assessment or EIS for a project, there will also likely be an opportunity for administrative appeal. For projects that are categorically excluded from NEPA, there will be relatively little public involvement.

If you have: submitted timely written comments during the planning process, filed an objection, and your objection was at least partially denied, you have met this requirement.

If you want to pursue your concerns further, one option is to file a lawsuit in federal court.

However, litigation is often costly and controversial, and there is no guarantee that a court will even hear the merits of your lawsuit. Your case could be thrown out for a variety of technical and procedural reasons, such as for lack of "standing" (you must show that your interests will be injured) or "ripeness" (you must show that it is not too soon for the court to consider your case).

WHAT YOU CAN DO: You should always consult with an attorney who is experienced in environmental and public land management cases. Among other things, the attorney can advise you whether the issues you want to raise are likely to be heard by a court now, or whether it would be better to wait for a site-specific activity to demonstrate the plan's on-the-ground effects.

There are numerous non-profit environmental law firms that frequently advise or represent citizens in forest plan litigation. There are also several recreation groups that maintain legal staff to advise or represent citizens in forest plan litigation.

Some private attorneys or commercial law firms also may be willing to pursue forest plan litigation on a reduced fee or pro bono (no charge) basis.



Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Reddit! Del.icio.us! Google! Live! Facebook! Technorati! StumbleUpon! MySpace! LinkedIn! TwitThis Joomla Free PHP

Leave your comments

0 / 300 Character restriction
Your text should be in between 10-300 characters
terms and condition.
  • No comments found
 
VALID CSS   |   VALID XHTML