Tread Lightly! 4x4 PSA BlueRibbon Coalition PSA California Association of 4 Wheel Drive Clubs
4x4Voice Home Access News USFS Water Quality Review Panel Meeting

OutdoorWire Calendar

4x4Voice Talk

The Carnegie SVRA General Plan team wants your input on concept alternatives whi...
1 week ago 0 132
The next meeting of the Bureau of Land Management’s (BLM) California Desert Advi...
1 week ago 0 85
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Off-Highway Motor Vehicle Recreation (OHMVR) Com...
1 week ago 0 126
The Sierra National Forest is in the middle of conducting a Forest Assessment, g...
1 month ago 0 439
California State Parks Director General Tony Jackson (USMC-Ret) was in attendanc...
1 month ago 0 563

Leave Your Comments

Additional information about the Greater Sage Grouse issue is available at: Federal Register Scopin...
The is one on the many monthly reports from the Cal4 NRC published on this site.
CA4WDC NRC South - Oct 2012 in Joomla Article
Wow, more stuff to learn. Thanks for the updates. Del

4x4Voice BLOGS

Inyo NF Topic Papers Released, Public Meetings Set
Inyo NF
Dear Forest Stakeholder:  I am pleased to announce a series of meetings to continue dialogue an...
Continue Reading...
CCMA Protest Filed
Natural Resource Consultants News
California Association of 4 Wheel Drive Clubs has joined a growing number of organizations protestin...
Continue Reading...
Death Valley National Park Proposes Fee Changes at Furnace Creek Campground
Death Valley NP
Death Valley National Park (Park) is seeking public comments regarding pricing for nineteen improve...
Continue Reading...
Bipartisan Bill to Reopen Clear Creek for Off-Road Vehicles
MUIRNet-News
Protects additional 21,000 acres as Joaquin Rocks Wilderness WASHINGTON - Congressman David G. Vala...
Continue Reading...




USFS Water Quality Review Panel Meeting PDF Print E-mail
User Rating: / 0
PoorBest 
Saturday, 26 May 2012 11:34

On Thursday, May 24, the US Forest Service held a Water Quality Review Panel meeting at the Yurok Tribal Headquarters in Klamath, CA.  For over three years I have been representing state-wide OHV interests while the Forest Service has been updating their Water Quality Management Handbook.  Other attendees included representatives of three Tribes (Yurok, Karuk, and Quartz Valley), Environmental Protection Information Center, Klamath Forest Alliance, Forest Service (Region 5 and Six Rivers NF) and State and Regional Water Board representatives.

In 2004, the State of California released a policy on waste discharge dealing with non-point source discharge pollution sources.  This policy requires the Forest Service to review their water quality management practices and comply with federal Clean Water Act and the state Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act mandates to reduce potential adverse impacts to water quality.





(For detailed information, see http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/rwqcb5/water_issues/basin_plans/appdx1.pdf)

In simple terms, the current management agreement requires the Forest Service to obtain Waste Discharge Requirement permits or Waivers of Waster Discharge Requirements for activities on Forest Service managed lands within the State of California in order to protect water quality.

The activities subject to Waste Discharge Requirement permits or Waivers of Waster Discharge Requirement include such things as grazing, mining, timber harvest, and OHV activity (including road and trail maintenance). 

In 2010, California Regional Water Board 1 and Forest Service established a "North Coast Waiver" that covered six northern California forests. This waiver complied with the 2004 state policy and excludes many activities from further revue by the Regional Water Board as long as they meet requirements of Best Management Practices and the Water Quality Management Handbook.

The State Water Board rejected an application by the Forest Service to establish a similar state-wide Waiver of Waste Discharge Requirements for routine projects within Forest Service managed lands.

As it stands, projects within the six North Coast forests are subject to the Water Board Region 1 waiver along with the Water Quality Management Handbook and Region 5 Best Management Practices.

The remaining Region 5 forests are subject to the Water Quality Management Handbook and Region 5 Best Management Practices and possible review by the specific Regional Water Board with jurisdiction over the specific National Forest under terms of a 1981 management agreement between Region 5 and the State Water Board.

For the most part, it will be "business as usual" with limited impact; except in cases where the Categorical Exclusion of a routine project is subjected to an appeal.  (Note, a recent court decision held that Categorial Exclusion projects are subject to appeal.)

For example, Sierra Trek is an activity on Forest Service managed lands.  Currently, it's permit is issued after review to ensure compliance with numerous federal laws and regulations, including the Clean Water Act, under a Categorical Exclusion.  As CEs are subject to appeal, should an appeal by filed, it would result in a minimum 45 day delay in issuing the final permit.

The State Water Board and Forest Service acknowledge a regulatory gap in achieving compliance with the 2004 State of California policy on waste discharge dealing with non-point source pollution sources.  Discussions continue at the State Water Board to resolve that issue.

This link is to the current Region 5 Water Quality Management Handbook which includes the Region 5 BMPs:

http://www.fs.fed.us/im/directives/field/r5/fsh/2509.22/r5-2509-22-10-2011-1.docx

This link is to the national Forest Service BMPs. 

http://www.fs.fed.us/biology/resources/pubs/watershed/FS_National_Core_BMPs_April2012.pdf

While both documents apply, within Region 5, the regional WQMH is the governing document.

 



Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Reddit! Del.icio.us! Google! Live! Facebook! Technorati! StumbleUpon! MySpace! LinkedIn! TwitThis Joomla Free PHP

Leave your comments

0 / 300 Character restriction
Your text should be in between 10-300 characters
terms and condition.
  • No comments found
 
VALID CSS   |   VALID XHTML