Notice: Trying to get property 'query' of non-object in /var/www/html/4x4voice/components/com_easyblog/router.php on line 648
From the Landuse Frontlines... - 4x4Voice

4x4Voice

Recreation, environment, access, and land use news and information for California.
4 minutes reading time (888 words)

From the Landuse Frontlines...

NRC South August 2019 Report

Forest Service - Comment period has closed on the USFS request for comments on the proposed NEPA rule change update the analysis and documentation of Categorical Exclusions.  This is a small, but important, point within the National Environmental Policy Act.  NEPA requires agencies to disclose and analyze the potential impacts their management decisions will have con the natural environment.  This has lead to overly cautious administrative process that subjects a majority of management decision to an Environmental Assessment or a more complex Environmental Impact Statement.

However, buried within NEPA is the ability of management actions to be classified and “routine in nature” and receive a Categorical Exclusion for the more time consuming and costly EA or EIS.  The proposed management actions continue to require an  analysis that describes the proposed action.  The proposed rule change would provide for a wider variety of actions (or decisions) to receive a Categorical Exclusion (CatEx) and proceed in a timely fashion.

For the OHV community, this would translate to fewer delays in replacing culverts and repairing trail damage.  However, it could also lead to closure of routes with limited opportunity to repair the trail damage.  Within the proposed rule, there are good points for OHV as well as the potential to have the proposed rule used against OHV.  The comments received will be reviewed and could potentially modify the proposed rule.  A final release of the proposed rule is not expected before early 2020.

Sequoia and Sierra National Forests have released their draft Revised Forest Management Plans.  The public is invited to comment on the proposed plans.  The comment period closes Sept. 26, 2019.

I attended meetings held by Sequoia and Sierra NFs concerning the draft plans and am reviewing the contents of the plans for their impact on OHV recreation.  Overall, these draft plans  are better than the last round plans.  However, there are some points of concern that I have with the draft plans. 

For the Sequoia NF, there is a proposed corridor for the Pacific Crest Trail that would define a vehicle exclusion about a mile wide.  While much of the PCT is within wilderness boundaries, the segments outside wilderness, especially within the Piute Mountains, could be a problem for OHV recreation.  Chief concern is the fact that Sequoia NF has yet to complete their required travel management plan for the Piute Mountains.  This is the only segment of National Forest within California (and, possibly the entire National Forest System) to not have a valid travel management plan.  Should criteria be set by the Forest Plan Revision that impacts existing trails, it would be easier to eliminate the trails from impact rather than mitigate the potential impacts received between the PCT and OHV Travel Management.

The Sequoia NF also has numerous proposed “wild and scenic river” designations.  At first glance, there are some points of concern; specifically the order of proposed designation of wild and scenic segments.

Wild and Scenic River legislation provides for three classes of designation, Wild, Scenic, and Recreation.  Each classification has prescribed management actions.  A Wild classification is the most stringent and prescribes that certain actions must be take to maintain water quality and the natural wild state of the river segment.  In general this would not be a problem if the Wild segment were located within wilderness area boundaries where the natural wild state can be preserved with limited potential impact by other forest uses/designations.

However, several proposed designations of wild and scenic within the Sequoia NF have Wild segments proposed downstream from Scenic and Recreational designations.  There are several designated OHV routes that could be impacted by the Wild designation that would not be impacted if the proposed designation were changed to Recreation.

BLM - The Bureau of Land Management is hosting a public meeting from 10 a.m. to noon, September 17, at the Barstow Field Office, 2601 Barstow Road, Barstow, CA.

The BLM will be presenting information concerning the management of the Dumont Dunes Off-Highway Vehicle (OHV) Recreation Area for the upcoming OHV season and seeking public comment on proposed implementation actions. Discussions will include dates for the five holidays, road maintenance and signs, and visitor center dates, hours and activities.

BLM is working to install route trail markers throughout the Mojave Desert region.  This has been an on-going project for about 10 years.  With the long delayed WEMO travel management coming to a close, Barstow Field Office is getting route markers installed.  The new markers north of Dumont Dunes towards the California-Nevada border have drawn criticism from local residents and the environment preservation community that want OHV recreation limited around the Death Valley National Park boundary.  Route designation signs are being placed and everyone is encouraged to abide by the signs permitting activity.

Legislation - There are several proposed legislation actions at the state and federal level that will impact OHV recreation.  Political campaign season is rapidly approaching.  The state of California legislature has a tendency to resurrect proposed legislation from the “dead file” and use “urgency” to have it passed.  The federal Congress will be winding down activities and shifting to campaign mode by the end of the year. 

Overall, the state and federal budget process will have significant impact on OHV recreation.  And, money and politics will be on full display in coming months.

Comments for Sequoia-Sierra Forest Plan Revision
Comments for USFS Proposed NEPA Rule Change

Related Posts

4x4Voice

OutdoorWire, 4x4Wire, JeepWire, TrailTalk, MUIRNet-News, and 4x4Voice are all trademarks and publications of OutdoorWire, Inc. and MUIRNet Consulting. Copyright (c) 1999-2019 OutdoorWire, Inc and MUIRNet Consulting - All Rights Reserved, no part of this publication may be reproduced in any form without express written permission. You may link freely to this site, but no further use is allowed without the express written permission of the owner of this material. All corporate trademarks are the property of their respective owners.

© 1999-2019 OutdoorWire, Inc. (MUIRNet Consulting)